Abstract
An economy where to provide cash is the only economic function of the State. It can at times be cash for specific purposes only: housing, groceries / restaurants (without alcohol, coffee, etc), education, health, or even entertainment. It supports the idea that by doing so, anyone is free to choose where, what, why and when to use the public service.
It’s based on the notion that all liberal projects failed for lack of a social sliver, or bottom-line, and that all socialist projects failed due to a constraint on liberty.
Liberty is being able to choose: where to live, what to eat, who to spend time with, what to work with, what to have fun with, what to sing and what to say, and the why or the purpose of it all. To find our Ikigai, and the whole exercise and universality of the true right to happiness.
Socialism is awareness that one is never alone in a society, but there is always someone else (our family, our friends, our communities, our nations, our countries, our blocks).
Sociology Table:
Selfish: One’s dreams concern and stay within oneself.
Materialism: (National Socialism: Fascist/Communist): if you don’t adapt to others you’ll starve to death.
Idealism (Liberalism): others are here to help your dreams come true.
Socio-Liberalism (a possible implementation of Idealism) as I’ve designed: others / public thing are here to give you the basics (food, shelter, health and education, but different from former welfare in the 70s: WITH ACTUAL MONEY INSTEAD, so you choose where to live and what to eat), and then you can propel your dreams forward. You can even be a billionaire, if you actually sell enough.
Others’ dreams not always concern us, nor should be a criteria for our survival, that’s against the Universal Letter of Human Rights.
Selfish is equivalent to insane. But insanity according to fascists and communists is not adapting to others (not having money, not agreeing with an ideology, speaking up).
To me, insanity is when you’re incapable of providing sanity (sanitary services) to others: Helping them sleep, eat and survive.
When one can send them money to survive, regardless of their ideology, deciding not to do so, based on any criteria, is a failure of Outsanity. Thus, the very definition of Insanity, by correlation.
The challenge for both Socialism and Liberalism was always in either having a monolithic goal (A National Project/Agenda/Government), or in the despise of the need for monolithic control (no correction, no Right, whatsoever).
It’s simple to resolve: distributed goals/dreams, monolithic norm (AI judges in drones with sleeping pills for criminals, and forensic tools for cybercriminals and corporate / financial criminals, to 403 error them, prior to intent fulfillment), running 24/7. The panopticon that works both for ignorants as for the wicked. I don’t need to care if I’m making a crime by mistake because my tax form is too complex, the system will fix it / prevent it for me.
I don’t care about any social program more than getting its fiat value in cash to make my own choices. That’s Liberty.
But I can’t use that cash to spend it with criminal activity. That’s Social Righteousness.